pauraque_bk: (Default)
pauraque_bk ([personal profile] pauraque_bk) wrote2009-06-24 09:24 pm
Entry tags:

"you'll never convince them"

There's a wank going on that's as old as the hills (aren't they all), and a lot of people are making extraordinary fools of themselves (don't they always). The epicenter wasn't in my part of fandom; my windows rattled but nothing fell down.

It does strike me, though, that in these sorts of things there's sometimes a tendency to suggest that all argument is useless because you'll never convince your opponents that you're right. I really can't agree there. If your point is a good and valid one, you should make it, not for your opponents, but for those reading along.

On the internets there are always more lurkers than participants. The ones opening their mouths are the ones who already have a strong opinion, and the more they talk, the more they have invested in never giving any ground or learning anything new, because in their eyes that would not be learning, but "losing".

The ones *not* speaking are the ones who aren't sure. Those are people your argument can reach, whether or not you ever find out about it. (Just try not to claim that the lurkers support you in email.)


And seriously, "victim privilege"? Bitch, PLEASE.


ETA: There's now a rundown on unfunnybusiness if you really want to know. Warning for nausea at others' ridiculous behavior, at the very least...

[identity profile] rexluscus.livejournal.com 2009-06-25 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. Just...really? When I got to the bit about "free-floating rage" my fail-o-meter broke.
pauraque: bird flying (Default)

[personal profile] pauraque 2009-06-25 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
I expect their rage is not floating quite so freely now that it has been presented with such an attractive target upon which to alight.