pauraque_bk (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
pauraque_bk) wrote2004-01-18 06:46 pm
pauraque_bk) wrote2004-01-18 06:46 pm
peter & neville links
Last night in #snapesupport, ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
wikdsushi treated us to this perfect little Peter/Neville drabble (R/NC-17, underage). It's just... all I could say last night was "GUH", and that pretty much sums it up. It's sick, yet well-characterized and pertinent to canon, and all too believable. It's also a beautiful example of the right way to do a drabble -- you're intensely present in the moment, yet every word does double duty to tell a *whole* story, not just a vignette.
Coincidentally,millefiori has just shared some thoughts on why she *doesn't* buy the supposed parallels between Neville and Peter. So either way you come down on the issue, there's something new and interesting to read. Hurrah!
wikdsushi treated us to this perfect little Peter/Neville drabble (R/NC-17, underage). It's just... all I could say last night was "GUH", and that pretty much sums it up. It's sick, yet well-characterized and pertinent to canon, and all too believable. It's also a beautiful example of the right way to do a drabble -- you're intensely present in the moment, yet every word does double duty to tell a *whole* story, not just a vignette.Coincidentally,
millefiori has just shared some thoughts on why she *doesn't* buy the supposed parallels between Neville and Peter. So either way you come down on the issue, there's something new and interesting to read. Hurrah!