Jan. 18th, 2004

pauraque_bk: (peter pettigrew)
Last night in #snapesupport, [livejournal.com profile] wikdsushi treated us to this perfect little Peter/Neville drabble (R/NC-17, underage). It's just... all I could say last night was "GUH", and that pretty much sums it up. It's sick, yet well-characterized and pertinent to canon, and all too believable. It's also a beautiful example of the right way to do a drabble -- you're intensely present in the moment, yet every word does double duty to tell a *whole* story, not just a vignette.

Coincidentally, [livejournal.com profile] millefiori has just shared some thoughts on why she *doesn't* buy the supposed parallels between Neville and Peter. So either way you come down on the issue, there's something new and interesting to read. Hurrah!
pauraque_bk: (peter pettigrew)
Last night in #snapesupport, [livejournal.com profile] wikdsushi treated us to this perfect little Peter/Neville drabble (R/NC-17, underage). It's just... all I could say last night was "GUH", and that pretty much sums it up. It's sick, yet well-characterized and pertinent to canon, and all too believable. It's also a beautiful example of the right way to do a drabble -- you're intensely present in the moment, yet every word does double duty to tell a *whole* story, not just a vignette.

Coincidentally, [livejournal.com profile] millefiori has just shared some thoughts on why she *doesn't* buy the supposed parallels between Neville and Peter. So either way you come down on the issue, there's something new and interesting to read. Hurrah!

Profile

pauraque_bk: (Default)
pauraque_bk

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 4 5678
91011 12 13 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 07:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios