sex is not different
Jan. 3rd, 2004 12:28 amThis is part of a comment I left over at
chresimos's place:
[M]ost people (including pro authors) seem to see sexuality as somehow separate from other aspects of life, and erotic feelings as fundamentally different from other emotions/sensations. I see this division as arbitrary and basically false. If you're a writer whose style involves precise and meaningful descriptions of physical sensations, you'll talk about the feeling of a sweater against the skin, the scent of a new sheet of paper, and so on. Now, when your character gets into a sexual situation, why should your writing style change? Why should your approach to the characters' reality change? Shouldn't it be just as right and real to talk about the feeling of your lover's hand on your cock, and the scent of his arousal? Where's the difference?
As a writer, you hope your readers will be right there with your characters, feeling what they feel. When you can describe a sweater in a way that makes your reader feel the comfort and nostalgia the character feels, that's a beautiful and positive thing; it's part of what makes good writing. When that empathy extends to sex, and the reader feels the eroticism of the moment right along with the character, why is that suddenly negative and anti-intellectual?
*
On the word association meme, was I the only one who responded to "sex" with "love"? Of course, I also responded to "dude" with "where's my car?", so it may not be all that meaningful.
*
I'm really rather disappointed that
hpbnfdeathmatch has gone missing. I was looking forward to getting the crap kicked out of me by some H/Der I've never heard of. (I actually *was*, is the thing.) Startlingly enough, I've just been friended by
bnfwatcher as well. Swear to god, dudes, you're way off. Nobody knows who the hell I am.
[M]ost people (including pro authors) seem to see sexuality as somehow separate from other aspects of life, and erotic feelings as fundamentally different from other emotions/sensations. I see this division as arbitrary and basically false. If you're a writer whose style involves precise and meaningful descriptions of physical sensations, you'll talk about the feeling of a sweater against the skin, the scent of a new sheet of paper, and so on. Now, when your character gets into a sexual situation, why should your writing style change? Why should your approach to the characters' reality change? Shouldn't it be just as right and real to talk about the feeling of your lover's hand on your cock, and the scent of his arousal? Where's the difference?
As a writer, you hope your readers will be right there with your characters, feeling what they feel. When you can describe a sweater in a way that makes your reader feel the comfort and nostalgia the character feels, that's a beautiful and positive thing; it's part of what makes good writing. When that empathy extends to sex, and the reader feels the eroticism of the moment right along with the character, why is that suddenly negative and anti-intellectual?
*
On the word association meme, was I the only one who responded to "sex" with "love"? Of course, I also responded to "dude" with "where's my car?", so it may not be all that meaningful.
*
I'm really rather disappointed that
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 01:02 am (UTC)Sex and sensuality are intertwined, and it is part of our existence on Earth. A beautiful description of sex should make you smile, or laugh...or make your mouth water.
I think the anti- intellectual arguments comes in when the sex scenes are done by rote, the same old "insert tab a into slot b".It does get wearying after a while, and you feel like you have read the same fic before...because you have.
Am so bitter, am not a bnf!
*sniff*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 03:49 pm (UTC)I'm sure you're better known than me, at least in Snapledore-aware circles. Aah, it's all bullshit anyway.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 01:47 am (UTC)You are a BNF in our hearts. Pity we never got a chance to vote for you :-( (though I do think you would have lost)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 06:04 am (UTC)Probably this is what draws me to certain authors. It may also be one's own perception of sexuality. Sex/eroticism are to my mind as much a part of life as eating and breathing, we are quite basic animals in some respects.
What is it with the ants by the way??
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 09:49 am (UTC)Yes. From a biological standpoint, reproduction is our primary purpose. Pretending that isn't the case is silly to me.
What is it with the ants by the way??
It's the rainy season here, which means ants get in the house.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 01:37 pm (UTC)Well, they do know, eo. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 07:04 pm (UTC)::insert attack of the fuzzy huggles here::
(And did you get my card yet? Hmm?)
And the thing with sex scenes is, yes, they do get can get rather repetitive after a while. And I suppose some authors feel uncomfortable letting people view something that can be seen as an extension of their own sexuality, and their private sexual fantasies. So for some, the smut scenes simply become not done. They may even still be written, but they're not given for public consumption.
And as far as the HPBNF situation goes, here's Fandom Wank's typically hilarious take on that place:
http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/265956.html
And the speculations on who HPBNF might have been, or why they deleted it, are very interesting indeed... bwahahahaha...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 07:53 pm (UTC)I did! I'm afraid we didn't win, but thank you anyway. :)
And I suppose some authors feel uncomfortable letting people view something that can be seen as an extension of their own sexuality, and their private sexual fantasies.
Maybe that's why I don't feel funny about writing sex, because it generally doesn't come from my own fantasies, no more so than any other aspect of a story.
And as far as the HPBNF situation goes, here's Fandom Wank's typically hilarious take on that place:
I was reading that earlier; I think I dropped an anonymous comment somewhere. I don't think it was
no subject
Date: 2004-01-03 10:42 pm (UTC)Good to hear! (Well... not that last part. I really wanted to win!) I still haven't gotten your card though. :( Damn the U.S. Postal Service... I use that address I gave you to all my EBay sellers and they get my items to me. Why they screwed up in this case I have no idea.
I blame Schwarzanegger. Everything's been going downhill in California since he came along.
I don't feel funny about writing sex, because it generally doesn't come from my own fantasies, no more so than any other aspect of a story.
Then you are a fascinatingly unique creature! All I can write is my fantasies made flesh (witness: Transvestite!Ron), which is why I stick to non-fiction stuff.
And dude... you NEED to get an account at Journalfen, so you can post regularly at Fandom Wank (. We'll have so much snarky fun. I'd offer you a code but... ::sob::... I have no idea where mine went. I guess I didn't redeem them on time, or something.
And HPBNF was rigged from the beginning to favor CC. She's such a wank magnet, even when she herself is being perfectly normal. I'm not sure whether to envy or pity her. ;D
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 10:14 pm (UTC)Of course, I haven't thought about it that much, so what do I know. I do like stories that have sex detailed by also have a story, characterization, and realism, but they're kind of rare. Bah...*ends rambling*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 10:57 pm (UTC)OMG U MANSLUT!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 11:24 pm (UTC)