PoA second viewing
Jun. 15th, 2004 01:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
pauraque_bkLast night I saw PoA with my mom and brother. My mom hasn't read the books, but enjoyed the first two movies, so she was my test case for whether the film would be comprehensible as a stand-alone.
She seemed to really like the movie for the most part, and didn't feel like it was confusing in general.
She didn't get a sense at all that the Snape-Sirius thing was personal. To her, Snape was basically clueless, and just wanted to save the kids. I mentioned "Vengeance is very sweet", and she agreed that it was odd in the context. This pretty much confirms my opinion that there's not really a reason for Snape to be in the movie at all, which is somewhat annoying.
She didn't wonder how Remus knew the map was a map. She figured, he's a smart guy who knows a lot about magic, it makes sense that he'd know. I talked a bit about the fact that it was the four friends who'd made the map, and that in the book it serves to emphasize the trust that was broken, but Mom didn't think that would have added much to the movie. The movie is essentially about Harry and James -- "the child is the father of the man", Mom said. The book's great epiphany is that Harry can't kill a man (even a traitor); the movie's revelation is that Harry has the power to grow up and be a man.
We talked about the story having the structure of a detective novel, dropping all the clues you need and then pulling it all together in a big expository scene at the end. "You're probably wondering why I've called you all here to this Shrieking Shack..." Mom said. Hee.
She seemed to have a gut-level revulsion for Peter, which rather delighted me -- he's supposed to be revolting. It was quite a kick to watch her make these horrified, train-wreck-can't-look-away realizations about him -- "So, he was a rat all that time? Twelve years, and he never changed back? And he was Ron's pet? And he slept in his bed? Ohhhh, gross!" ♥
I mentioned that one of the reasons I like Peter is that he's the only villain whose evil plans actually work, and whom Harry fails to outwit. "Well, that's just because he scurried away like the little rat he is," said Mom.
She also said that for a second, when Harry saw Peter's name on the map, she thought of "all that was left was his finger", and flashed to Thing from the Addams Family. Bwah! Now THAT's a fic! :D
(By the way, did human!Peter actually have a visibly missing finger in the movie? I couldn't quite see.)
You know, some people thought Peter's movie characterization was awful, some people loved it, and... I don't even have an opinion. His voice is so strongly established in my mind that the movie practically had no effect on me. This isn't the case with, say, Remus, whose voice I have a really hard time pinning down. Even after just a couple of viewings, movie!Remus has encroached really far into my personal canon.
What I can say, though, is that I don't like what the screenwriter did with Peter. What's wonderful about the Shrieking Shack is that Peter and Sirius are desperately competing for Harry's mercy (James's forgiveness, in their minds), and they both end up feeling like they have it. Once Peter is spared by Harry (a huge emotional release for him), he doesn't have any more dialogue -- on some level, he's satisfied. In the movie, he keeps going on about "anything but the Dementors", and his pleas to Ron and Hermione come after that... It weakens what's interesting about the character and the scene.
On the whole, though, I enjoyed the movie more on second viewing, probably because I wasn't on the edge of my seat going ohmygodhowaretheygonnadothis the entire time. Oddly enough, it felt a bit more like the book's pacing -- the Shrieking Shack scene didn't feel so shockingly brief, and the Time Turner sequence seemed longer.
Random observations:
-Sirius has on striped prisoner's robes. Peter is wearing a pinstripe suit. A visual pun: You have to look sideways to see the truth. Very nice.
-Does anyone remember the Heaven's Gate cult? With the purple blankets? The Great Hall sleepover scene looked creepily like that. I'm just sayin'.
-A wizard in the Leaky Cauldron is reading "A Brief History of Time". I noticed that the first time, but not very many people seem to have mentioned it in their reviews. Mad foreshadowing props to Cuaron.
-Mirrors. After the Dementor leaves, Harry sees his reflection in the train window -- looking into himself, his memories. The Boggart scene opens with the camera moving through the mirrored wardrobe -- looking into our fears. As![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
lycoris recently pointed out, when Harry turns to look at Peter in the corridor, he sees a mirror -- himself. His past?
She seemed to really like the movie for the most part, and didn't feel like it was confusing in general.
She didn't get a sense at all that the Snape-Sirius thing was personal. To her, Snape was basically clueless, and just wanted to save the kids. I mentioned "Vengeance is very sweet", and she agreed that it was odd in the context. This pretty much confirms my opinion that there's not really a reason for Snape to be in the movie at all, which is somewhat annoying.
She didn't wonder how Remus knew the map was a map. She figured, he's a smart guy who knows a lot about magic, it makes sense that he'd know. I talked a bit about the fact that it was the four friends who'd made the map, and that in the book it serves to emphasize the trust that was broken, but Mom didn't think that would have added much to the movie. The movie is essentially about Harry and James -- "the child is the father of the man", Mom said. The book's great epiphany is that Harry can't kill a man (even a traitor); the movie's revelation is that Harry has the power to grow up and be a man.
We talked about the story having the structure of a detective novel, dropping all the clues you need and then pulling it all together in a big expository scene at the end. "You're probably wondering why I've called you all here to this Shrieking Shack..." Mom said. Hee.
She seemed to have a gut-level revulsion for Peter, which rather delighted me -- he's supposed to be revolting. It was quite a kick to watch her make these horrified, train-wreck-can't-look-away realizations about him -- "So, he was a rat all that time? Twelve years, and he never changed back? And he was Ron's pet? And he slept in his bed? Ohhhh, gross!" ♥
I mentioned that one of the reasons I like Peter is that he's the only villain whose evil plans actually work, and whom Harry fails to outwit. "Well, that's just because he scurried away like the little rat he is," said Mom.
She also said that for a second, when Harry saw Peter's name on the map, she thought of "all that was left was his finger", and flashed to Thing from the Addams Family. Bwah! Now THAT's a fic! :D
(By the way, did human!Peter actually have a visibly missing finger in the movie? I couldn't quite see.)
You know, some people thought Peter's movie characterization was awful, some people loved it, and... I don't even have an opinion. His voice is so strongly established in my mind that the movie practically had no effect on me. This isn't the case with, say, Remus, whose voice I have a really hard time pinning down. Even after just a couple of viewings, movie!Remus has encroached really far into my personal canon.
What I can say, though, is that I don't like what the screenwriter did with Peter. What's wonderful about the Shrieking Shack is that Peter and Sirius are desperately competing for Harry's mercy (James's forgiveness, in their minds), and they both end up feeling like they have it. Once Peter is spared by Harry (a huge emotional release for him), he doesn't have any more dialogue -- on some level, he's satisfied. In the movie, he keeps going on about "anything but the Dementors", and his pleas to Ron and Hermione come after that... It weakens what's interesting about the character and the scene.
On the whole, though, I enjoyed the movie more on second viewing, probably because I wasn't on the edge of my seat going ohmygodhowaretheygonnadothis the entire time. Oddly enough, it felt a bit more like the book's pacing -- the Shrieking Shack scene didn't feel so shockingly brief, and the Time Turner sequence seemed longer.
Random observations:
-Sirius has on striped prisoner's robes. Peter is wearing a pinstripe suit. A visual pun: You have to look sideways to see the truth. Very nice.
-Does anyone remember the Heaven's Gate cult? With the purple blankets? The Great Hall sleepover scene looked creepily like that. I'm just sayin'.
-A wizard in the Leaky Cauldron is reading "A Brief History of Time". I noticed that the first time, but not very many people seem to have mentioned it in their reviews. Mad foreshadowing props to Cuaron.
-Mirrors. After the Dementor leaves, Harry sees his reflection in the train window -- looking into himself, his memories. The Boggart scene opens with the camera moving through the mirrored wardrobe -- looking into our fears. As
lycoris recently pointed out, when Harry turns to look at Peter in the corridor, he sees a mirror -- himself. His past?
