Date: 2004-06-30 11:14 am (UTC)
he could have made a film that zeroed in more closely on particular corrupt practices, addressed the other side's rebuttals, and absolutely demolished the administration's credibility

Yes, exactly. And he could have done just that -- the holes in the administration's arguments are a mile wide and begging to be demolished.

What this movie does do, however, is serve as a record of why people are angry and what the objections are to what's going on. That, I think, makes this a film that will be very important in a historical context, even if it doesn't change minds now

I do think it's a good film, and I do think it will stand as an important historical document. But we need more than that now. If Bush is re-elected, the ramifications will be widespread -- from the supreme court to civil rights to the economy to the lives of people in countries the administration deems threatening. What we desperately needed was a documentary that would open eyes and enlighten those who don't have access to (or, sadly, the inclination to locate) information beyond corporate U.S. news. What we needed was -- and I always flinch to have to say it -- effective propaganda, pure and simple. And I don't think F9/11 pulled that off.

Alas, in the past four years my idealism has gone into survival mode. I'm looking forward to a day when that changes.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

pauraque_bk: (Default)
pauraque_bk

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 4 5678
91011 12 13 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 04:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios