Date: 2004-07-15 06:04 am (UTC)
I think Peter rules so I'm inclined to believe that he is slick enough to fool people, especially if they don't think to frequently scan his brain to check his loyalty. But there was other evidence lying around to implicate Peter that Dumbledore should have picked up on.

Dumbledore makes so many ridiculous mistakes, I don't know how to keep on making excuses for him when new readers ask me: "What's up with Dumbledore??"

At the very least, they had Sirius Black, they could have Occulmens-ed him or stuck his head in a pensieve thingy or done that spell they do on people's wands to see what they cast. Weren't they even slightly curious as to why he went bad? You'd think they'd want to answer some questions.

I also would like to know why they suspected Lupin, and if they did, why they didn't Occulmens him or whatever and get to the bottom of who was the traitor??

They're so sloppy ---BOTH sides in this "war" are!! It gives me the impression that if either side had ONE leader who actually acted rationally this whole thing would be over and done with in a week.

And then we'd have more chapters for Quidditch---forget I said anything, actually...

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

pauraque_bk: (Default)
pauraque_bk

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 4 5678
91011 12 13 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 12:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios