pauraque_bk: (chamber of secrets)
[personal profile] pauraque_bk
All kinds of discussion in Chapter 18, but I'd like to call special attention to [livejournal.com profile] black_dog's comments in defense of Dumbledore, because they're way far down the page, and because I think he's the only person who didn't agree with my assessment of what Dumbledore says. *g*

The first part.

The second part. (This bit also calls Ginny's innocence into question, which I think is wicked interesting.)

*

THANK YOU to everyone who participated in the re-read. You guys are great. All the posts are saved here. (And the PoA re-read is here. Two down, three to go. [Or five, if I'm around that long.])

My opinion of the book as a whole hasn't changed very much; it's still not a favorite. It lacks the depth and coherence of PoA, as well as the theme of love that's so important to the latter three books. I have no idea if JKR meant it to read this way, but at the end of the book Harry is handed the moral that he was right to be loyal to Dumbledore, not that he was right to risk his life to save another. At every turn, the book is cheerfully cruel -- Crabbe and Goyle left locked in a closet, Hagrid carted off to Azkaban, Lockhart dealt a comeuppance out of proportion to his crimes (I kept thinking of Hansel and Gretl pushing the witch into the oven).

The movie version is a fair (in the sense of 'just') adaptation for the most part, except that it tacks on a sappy ending. Having read the book more carefully, I can sympathize with the urge to add some sugar -- the thing's downright nasty. This is a story where, when a little girl is rescued from certain death, her parents -- whom we're meant to like -- don't even give her a hug. [EDIT: Actually, they do, I just can't read. But Ginny's suffering still isn't given adequate weight, in my opinion.]

I'm also no more enlightened about what the book might once have had to do with half-blood princes than I was to start with. I do think the good money is on Godric Gryffindor to be the HBP, but there isn't a lot in CoS to support that claim, except the general introduction of the story of the Founders.

But, in any case, I certainly enjoyed all the discussion. I'll probably do PS/SS next, though not right away (I've got a [livejournal.com profile] merry_smutmas fic to write -- eep). If you fear withdrawal, there's a chapter-a-week OotP read-along happening at [livejournal.com profile] the_snarkery. They're up to Chapter 9.

Date: 2004-11-12 04:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stellahobbit.livejournal.com
Thanks for your insightful comments, and the opportunity to read what others think. I didn't make one comment during this session (it was all said before me and very eloquently) but look forward to your next analysis.

Date: 2004-11-12 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melpemone.livejournal.com
Thank YOU for the discussion. I didn't get as much of a chance to participate as I'd have liked, but it was enlightening as hell all the same.

And I agree with you - I'm not keen on PoA, as a general rule, but CoS is definitely my least favourite. It more than serves its purpose as a part of the whole, and is likeable in that respect, but CoS is the one I've least re-read.

Date: 2004-11-12 05:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gmth.livejournal.com
That was fun! :-)

I agree with you about this book; it's my least favorite of the series. However, the film version is my favorite of the three so far (mmmmmm... Jason Isaacs...).

Looking forward to the next read-through. And to your Smutmas fic.

Date: 2004-11-12 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] black-dog.livejournal.com
Thank you for leading this discussion -- for the huge amount of work you put in, for giving us all such insightful (and fun) introductions to each chapter and for keeping the conversation going.

I couldn't keep up with this one in real time either :( but have been frantically catching up the past week, enjoying all the posts, picking up all kinds of insights about I book I'd really neglected in the past. I'm really looking forward to your read-through of PS/SS!

Date: 2004-11-12 10:20 am (UTC)
maidenjedi: (signs_saava)
From: [personal profile] maidenjedi
I've been following along with this, but not having my copy of CoS here at school prevented me from actually participating. Once again, thanks for doing these, because it provides some real insight and things to think on while waiting (im)patiently for HBP.

Do you really think Lockhart's punishment disproportionate to his crimes? He's spent an unknown number of years taking credit for other people's successes, using Memory Charms (which, incidentally, don't seem to be controlled by the Ministry the way other charms are....hmm) without any apparent discrimination, and when he tries, once again, to take the credit (and let a little girl and possibly two little boys die in the process), he's rendered amnesiac. I think it's perfectly just, almost poetic. It's a lesson, too, for Harry. The fact that we see Lockhart again in OotP, just as Harry's at a place where his anger combined with his desire to be a part of things could drive him to do unethical if not illegal things, suggests to me that Harry's (and maybe not Harry, but someone else - Ron, possibly) meant to take Lockhart's plight as an example. There are a number of lessons like that in the books - Quirrell's death, Snape's childhood, even Sirius' death.

Heh....$.02 I didn't know I was about to contribute ;-)

Date: 2004-11-12 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seventines.livejournal.com
Just wanted to say thanks, Eo. I really enjoyed that, I found out lots I didn't know, I thought about lots of things I'd missed. You and your flist are an insightful and thoughtful bunch of people. Enjoy your writing :D

Date: 2004-11-12 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queen-ian.livejournal.com
well its been very fascinating and a real eye-opener (though i havent ever been able to think of anything to comment, due to lacking the appropriate brain power) and i now have to go and read the PoA read through. but first id just like to point out:

'"Ginny!"
It was Mrs Weasley, who had been sitting crying in front of the fire. She leapt to her feet, closely followed by Mr Weasley, and both of them flung themselves at their daughter.' (pg 241, english edition)

Date: 2004-11-12 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arclevel.livejournal.com
'Twas quite fun; I look forward to the next one. Thanks for fearlessly leading us, o fearless leader. :-)

Date: 2004-11-12 03:49 pm (UTC)
ext_7651: (quibbler)
From: [identity profile] idlerat.livejournal.com
Harry is handed the moral that he was right to be loyal to Dumbledore, not that he was right to risk his life to save another.

This is a very strange episode to me, the issue of personal loyalty in relation to Dumbledore (also evident in the moment when DD reads the name "Dumbledore's Army," but by far the most extreme here). It's one of the ways in which Dumbledore most resembles that God character from the Bible: thou shalt have no other headmasters before me. God that sounded porny!

cheerfully cruel

This was and has been one of my strongest impressions of JKR from the get-go, and perhaps it was particularly influenced by this book. She's ruthless (like Hermione? that's what folks say about Hermione these days anyway. Maybe I should start thinking of times when Hermione shows ruth. But I digress.) I do think this toughness is a strong element in a lot of texts that are popular with children, and a key to HP's success--not only commercial but artistic. Not that I particularly cotten to this cruelty, but I think there's an anti-sentimentalism in Rowling that is necessary to cut the extreme sentimental potential of a lot in her narrative, like the acidity in Coke cuts the sugar. I'm not quite nailing it, but I think something like this is a big part of why I like the books. I also think it speaks to her interest in writing about boys--Harry's resistance to showing weakness, e.g.

Date: 2004-11-12 04:03 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Enjoying)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
I really really enjoyed this. Thanks!

Date: 2004-11-13 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chresimos.livejournal.com
Thanks for doing this again! :D

I had everything open that I was going to reply to for the past few chapters and then it all crashed...argh. Suffice it to say that

But Ginny's suffering still isn't given adequate weight, in my opinion.

I agree. And thus the speculations that give way to the good T/G are born. >:D But. Even in a non-shippy context, one of the things I expected(and hoped!) to find in fanfic was more appropriate levels of Ginny angst. I was joyed by the little reference in OotP, to be sure, but I don't think anything more will come of the ordeal in canon, alas, alas.

Also I remember you talking about this movie and random gratuitous otherpost linkage is the thing to do, yaaay...

Date: 2004-11-13 09:34 am (UTC)
ext_7739: (Default)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_hannelore/
Thanks so much for doing this, I'd really like to snag a moment sometime and read over everyone's comments. So many plotbunnies.

Date: 2004-11-15 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thecoldacre.livejournal.com
I friended you at the start of your re-read, to make sure I didn't miss any posts. And although I've been too afraid to comment (seriously, I thought that I had thought of every possible theory, but the insight that people showed for every chapter was just amazing. And they managed to express themselves much more eloquently than I ever could) I enjoyed it very much. Thanks.

Profile

pauraque_bk: (Default)
pauraque_bk

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 4 5678
91011 12 13 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 06:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios