Politics for a Tuesday
Nov. 16th, 2004 11:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The best evidence suggests that LJ is much more liberal than the general population. My own election poll, primarily answered by fandom people, went even more overwhelmingly for Kerry. (I also asked only US citizens to participate; if I'd opened it up to everyone, I'm sure we'd've seen even more Kerry votes.)
Based on these polls, LJ fandom resembles a strongly Democratic-voting city, like Philadelphia or Washington, DC. That gels with my subjective experience of what the political views of online fans are like -- we're a big bunch of liberals. It feels much like my real life, and I live in Berkeley.
There are conservatives in fandom, of course, and they seem to be well aware they're in the minority, as the success of
therightfangirl should attest.
So, my question of the day is: Why is online fandom so liberal? When this comes up, I usually hear variations on two different answers:
1. The internet as a whole is liberal.
We've already seen that LJ is liberal, and it seems to make sense that the internet would be, because so many internet users are sub/urban (or at least were in 1998). Then again, many users are also financially successful, which could indicate greater conservatism.
And there are online services that more accurately reflect the politics of the general population than LJ. AOL polls, for example, usually seem close(r) to national polls. I'm also reminded of that online newspaper poll on gay marriage some months back that we all encouraged each other to go vote in. It was a pretty even split. (But are conservatives better at organizing? Well, that's another topic.)
If there are any fandom oldbies listening, what were politics like before fandom got online?
2. It's the slash, baby.
Can this possibly be a major factor? Do conservatives really go looking for fanfic online, notice slash, and take their business elsewhere? Surely there are enough het and gen fandom outlets to make this a non-issue, except for the most savagely anti-gay individuals. (Ooh, has anyone polled the politics at the Sugar Quill?)
Or maybe it's the other way around. Are liberals attracted to fandom in greater numbers because of the gay-friendly atmosphere?
Responses from conservatives would be especially welcome.
Based on these polls, LJ fandom resembles a strongly Democratic-voting city, like Philadelphia or Washington, DC. That gels with my subjective experience of what the political views of online fans are like -- we're a big bunch of liberals. It feels much like my real life, and I live in Berkeley.
There are conservatives in fandom, of course, and they seem to be well aware they're in the minority, as the success of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
So, my question of the day is: Why is online fandom so liberal? When this comes up, I usually hear variations on two different answers:
1. The internet as a whole is liberal.
We've already seen that LJ is liberal, and it seems to make sense that the internet would be, because so many internet users are sub/urban (or at least were in 1998). Then again, many users are also financially successful, which could indicate greater conservatism.
And there are online services that more accurately reflect the politics of the general population than LJ. AOL polls, for example, usually seem close(r) to national polls. I'm also reminded of that online newspaper poll on gay marriage some months back that we all encouraged each other to go vote in. It was a pretty even split. (But are conservatives better at organizing? Well, that's another topic.)
If there are any fandom oldbies listening, what were politics like before fandom got online?
2. It's the slash, baby.
Can this possibly be a major factor? Do conservatives really go looking for fanfic online, notice slash, and take their business elsewhere? Surely there are enough het and gen fandom outlets to make this a non-issue, except for the most savagely anti-gay individuals. (Ooh, has anyone polled the politics at the Sugar Quill?)
Or maybe it's the other way around. Are liberals attracted to fandom in greater numbers because of the gay-friendly atmosphere?
Responses from conservatives would be especially welcome.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:38 am (UTC)And the Internet can be said to be libertarian, which is a conservative denomination.
However, by and large, the Internet is younger than the general population, and that could have an effect. (Although any 1998 figures are meaningless;: the sociology of the medium has changed too much since; only a few people were using the Net regularly at the time.)
(And I loathe the Sugarquill - there's enough smiling cultists ringing my doorbell, thankyouverymuch.)
Oh, and to mess with your idea of international opinion - I'm pro-Bush, and I'm French. No, really. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:48 am (UTC)Anyway, to throw out my opinion, I think part of what you're seeing is that internet users are likely to be more educated than non-users, and education correlates with liberalism. Looking at the professions of people involved in fandom (who I know), I see heavy weighting toward librarians, teachers, scientists and computer geeks - all which tend toward the liberal politically. Most fans are women, and women tend to vote liberal (although not so much in this last election, apparently, as historically, according to a recent article in the Washington Post). And the fandoms I participate in are book-based fandoms, and the typical avid reader tends to be more educated than nonreaders, see above.
chiming in
Date: 2004-11-16 11:51 am (UTC)I have A LOT to say about this.....but I have to run out the door. I'll be back. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:55 am (UTC)I certainly realize that not all conservatives are anti-gay, and I didn't mean to imply it. But a correlation does exist.
Libertarians are funny; they can't really be pinned to one side of the spectrum or the other. I think calling them either leftist or rightist is an oversimplification.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:57 am (UTC)Ahahaha. This question from a post on
1. So, right-wing fangirls - what's that all about? How do you reconcile right-wingness with fangirlness? Are the two inherently opposed, or connected?
It sort of boggles me, in a 'geez, that's just odd' way, that there's an implication that since so many fans are liberals and conservatives are the minority, fans must "reconcile" their conservative political stance with, uh, a tendency towards fanatacism.
Or maybe it's just an assumption, rather than an implication, that the people on the community are into slash and other rather subversive types of fandom expression. In that case, the remark about reconciliation would seem to imply some sort of guilt in their fangirl status: that maybe there is something inherently conflicting about supporting an administration that is empowering homophobia, while they get their jollies by imagining sexy gay boys being all sexy together.
Just a thought. :D
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:21 pm (UTC)I think that fandom tends to skew towards the liberal end of the political spectrum because of demographic factors (online fans tend to be young and in school, and college campuses tend to be liberal-friendly), but also because of the nature of fannish interests. SF/F is all about being open to "the other" somehow. Fans tend to embrace new ideas and see out people and ideas that are different. They're more tolerant of differences than conservatives.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:48 pm (UTC)I also think for the most part you have to be open to different people with different ideas when you participate in fandom. If you aren't, then fandom isn't very fun, cause what would be the point? I also think that participating helps you appreciate other people who are different from you because there is such a wide variety of people online, so maybe being active and involved in fandom makes you even more liberal?
My sister and I were talking about "sides"/"wings" the other day. She is a libertarian and I'm a liberal. Both our parents are conservatives. We agreed that being more educated and aware than our parents got us out of the conservative mindset (not that I'm saying that all conservatives are uneducated, but our parents are certainly are).
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:21 pm (UTC)I think the previous posters have come up with some compelling ideas as to why the online fandom at least seems to be heavily liberal-leaning. Youth, educational level, the Internet as a medium, and perhaps the fantasy genre.
It could be the slash factor as well; I play in the het and gen corners of the fandom and find myself interacting with/friending more conservatives and middle-of-the-road types. (And, incidentally, the Sugar Quill does have quite a few liberals - me, for one.)
Another reason that one might perceive more liberals in the fandom is that the liberals tend to be very outspoken about their liberalism and perhaps the conservatives and middle-of-the-roaders don't talk about their political convictions as much?
Perhaps different fandoms attract different political leanings. In the one other fandom I'm in (Earth's Children - a teeny weeny fandom) there's a lot of very conservative, religious, homeschool-the-kids people. Fandom is definitely YMMV. (And as long as people are polite and good writers, barring dangerous crackpotism, political leanings shouldn't matter.)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:36 pm (UTC)I don't think education is as big a factor as people might guess unless you mean very educated, because aside from people holding higher degrees, the exit polls showed high school and college graduates favored Bush. The least educated (no high school degree) favored Kerry. Yes, college campuses are extremely liberal and college kids have fast, free internet connections and a lot of spare time.
I think slash may perhaps be a big reason why so many more in the fandom are liberal. The message in Harry Potter is liberal. My guess is that if the gay issue had not been such a big factor in this election, you would have seen a lot more conservatives 'coming out' on LJ. Then again, polls may have looked quite different on Harry Potter for Grown-Ups or Mugglenet or Sugar Quill or TLC.
There is also the 'sharing' factor for LJ as a whole. I think liberal types are more willing to put their personal lives out there on internet. If you are a strong social conservative, you probably believe in keeping your private life private. Liberals are open to new ideas and probably do get around the internet more. Then there is the youth factor.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 04:03 pm (UTC)I'm sure you're right on track with the women thing though. The fact that HP fandom is so heavily female probably has something to do with our heavy majority of liberal-leaners.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 05:06 pm (UTC)I think that it's got a lot to do with the slash. There is something wrong with your head, imnsho, if you get off on the idea of gay sex but want to oppress the actual human beings who have it in RL.
I have no idea why the fandom is overwhelmingly anti-war and anti-military (I'm unhappy with what we're doing in Iraq, namely fucking up and screwing the civilians, but was more than okay with the whole get-Saddam idea), but as Harry Potter does contain a number of strongly liberal messages (censorship is ok if it's used to prevent violence-as-opposed-to-sex, the spread of dangerous info should be restricted, all dangerous talents/items should be registered) it's not awfully surprising. I mean, part of the reason I hate Dumbledork so much is that he's like a total personification of the nanny state sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:53 pm (UTC)I've floated through several SF/F fandoms and as they've all been pretty liberal. As
I really don't think it has anything to do with slash, but since slash is an 'other', liberals are more receptive to it than traditional conservatives might be.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 07:10 pm (UTC)That's part of it, but for me personally, I'm afraid of getting flamed by the liberals on my flist if I were to come out conservative. A couple of very trusted friends know I'm a Republican, but for the most part, I keep that secret to avoid wank.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 07:18 pm (UTC)You may vote conservative, and this is not exclusively true, but it's there.
I mean, if you take a look at all the "important" distopian society 'warning' books, they're all science fiction - 1984, Farenheit 451, A Brave New World.
Sci-fi and fantasy, just by liking them, require you to be more accepting of differences. This character is a bright blue alien shaped like a giant scorpion, and he's in a love with the non-gendered water-breathing orange guy who looks like a squid? Okay!
And, as a general rule, people who are socially conservative tend to be less accepting of differences as a general rule (hence their hatred of gays, the number of racists still around, etc.), which pretty much rules out an awful lot of science fiction and fantasy.
It's not a firm rule, of course, but I think there's something to it.
Once you hit slash, of course, you're starting to hit people who are even more socially liberal, due to the whole "I spend all my freetime reading about men having sex" factor.
(notice that I specify 'socially liberal'. You can be socially liberal and be a Republican or a Libertarian.)
*shrugs* I might be talking out my ass, but it's what I've always come up with.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 07:33 pm (UTC)