ani_bester complains of
InexplicablyThin!Peter, and I quite agree with her. Let him be fat. Let Neville and Dudley be fat as well, while you're at it. When you write these characters having sex, it isn't necessary to excuse yourself by pointedly noting a convenient over-the-summer weight loss.
That is all.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-22 01:58 am (UTC)That said-- hear, hear.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-22 08:11 am (UTC)That said, I'm a very large woman myself and it does bother me the way JKR has made most of her worst characters fat. However, I say let them *be* fat, if that's what they are. So yeah, agreeing with you in a roundabout way. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-22 11:25 am (UTC)Yeah, it's a troublesome element in her writing. And in a way, it's why it makes me so very annoyed when people buy into that unfair stereotype, and can't write those characters sympathetically without taking off the weight. I don't usually have that "stick it to the man" feeling when I write in JKR's universe -- "Ha! I'm subverting your intentions!" -- but in this case, I do. She's doing a thing I disagree with, and I like to see it undone by fans.
I'm not a fan of pretty!Snape either. His hair's greasy, let it stay that way.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-22 02:21 pm (UTC)Remus: (looks at pillow, which is smeary)
Severus: What?
Remus: Nothing.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-22 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:28 am (UTC)Funnily enough, that's why I was really hoping that Millicent Bulstrode was going to be a 'good' Slytherin in OotP.
I was a big, tall girl at the age of 12, completely capable of and willing to put my classmates in a headlock -- so I wound up identifying with her and being disappointed that JKR made her an Inquistorial goon.
Frankly, sometimes the way that Harry's perceptions are so shallows drives me up the wall and into subverting the authorial intention out of pure orneryness.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 01:19 pm (UTC)Or something.
Maybe it's just wishful thinking, but even so...*crosses fingers for Millicent*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 02:12 am (UTC)(Now I want to write Millicent/Hermione...)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-26 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-26 11:24 am (UTC)It's not so much that she had power as an Inquistorial Squad, but that she decided to be a *goon* with it that upset me.
loong reply
Date: 2004-08-26 11:35 am (UTC)I mean, Snape 'favours' them unlike McGonagall and her Gryffindors, according to the narrative; but do we ever see Snape offering to help his students achieve their career aspirations? Or even awarding them points?
A lot of people branded the Slytherins 'evil' for associating themselves with bureaucracy but failed to see that Umbridge's petty 'play it by the book' insistence on rules was merely taking advantage of the flaws already inherent in the system.
It wasn't, for example, Umbridge's fault that the teaching standards at Hogwarts were mixed, at best, with students being injured under Hagrid's care, for example.
It wasn't Umbridge's fault that Harry and George failed to control their tempers post Quidditch, or that under the previous Head, a detention would have sufficed (this being McGonagall's prescribed punishment, not Dumbledore's. However, anyone think Dumbledore would have pushed for a harder punishment?)
Or that the students most likely to become Death Eaters were ignored by staff and close to failing academically (Crabbe and Goyle) whereas the popular Gryffindor students were allowed to run riot (the train hexings, for example.)
Anyway. This is a spammy response, but just my two cents. (I was ranting in my lj recently on this topic - http://www.livejournal.com/users/roxannelinton/26521.html)